Executing an international telegraphic transfer (T/T) involves multiple financial intermediaries, each assessing specific charges. Total payment expenses are divided across four key components: initial remitting bank fees, intermediary correspondent network surcharges, receiving bank processing costs, and foreign exchange (FX) spread margins. How these expenses are distributed depends directly on the selected SWIFT charge code, order values, currency conversion parameters, and clearing pathways across global banking channels.

Cross-border telegraphic transfers rely on the SWIFT network to relay payment instructions between international financial institutions. When funding overseas garment manufacturing orders—such as custom heavyweight hoodies, cargo pants, or graphic t-shirts—the buyer's bank sends an electronic transfer message to the seller's bank. If no direct clearing agreement exists between the sender and receiver, the payment is routed through intermediate correspondent banks, which deduct processing fees unless explicitly instructed otherwise.
The standard SWIFT Field 71A protocol provides three specific methods for assigning these financial responsibilities:
For custom manufacturing projects with strict minimum order quantities (MOQs)—ranging from 50 pieces per style up to 1,000 pieces per SKU for private label collections—utilizing SHA or BEN instructions frequently causes invoice shortfalls. For instance, in recurring brand operations such as the UK-based Vanguard Shop Co. managing 24 annual product drops, short-paid balances caused by intermediary fee deductions can delay initial sample approvals (taking 3–15 days) or full production cycles (requiring 20–35 days). Choosing OUR settlement terms or utilizing supplementary local payment channels like Alipay helps avoid balance discrepancies and prevents production downtime.

Reviewing how each SWIFT code distributes transfer charges helps businesses choose the right remittance strategy for international trade.
| SWIFT Charge Code | Responsible Party | Effect on Amount Received | Typical Cost (USD) | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OUR | Remitter (Buyer) | Full invoice amount (100%) received | $25 – $65 (paid at origination) | Sample orders, initial deposit payments, and fixed contract settlements. |
| SHA (Shared) | Split Allocation | Reduced by $15 – $50 intermediary charges | $15 – $30 per party | Routine, ongoing reorders where minor balance differences can be balanced later. |
| BEN (Beneficiary) | Beneficiary (Seller) | Deducted from principal payment | $30 – $75 total deductions | Rarely recommended for OEM/ODM orders; requires prior vendor agreement. |
Why is the final received wire transfer lower than the original invoice amount?
When wires are submitted using SHA or BEN codes, intermediary correspondent banks deduct routing fees ($15 to $50) directly from the transferring principal before it arrives at the destination account.
Which SWIFT payment instruction is recommended for custom garment orders?
The OUR charge code is strongly recommended for sample payments and production deposits. It guarantees that the manufacturer receives the full contract amount, preventing delays in fabric procurement and job ticket release.
How do foreign currency conversion rates affect wire transfer costs?
Commercial banks add an FX markup (spread) over real-time interbank rates during currency conversions. This exchange margin typically adds 1% to 3% to total payment costs if local currency is converted at the remitting bank rather than transferred directly in target currencies.
Preventing payment disputes in international trade requires establishing clear agreement on SWIFT instruction tags and delivery terms before issuing wire transfers. Selecting OUR fee allocation for sample developments and initial deposits ensures full invoice fulfillment and immediate job ticket authorization. Combining clear wire instructions with established shipping arrangements—such as FOB Shenzhen or DDP Door-to-Door via ocean freight (FCL/LCL), air cargo, or express courier (DHL/FedEx/UPS)—keeps total landed costs predictable. For custom solutions or operational questions, contact us directly at yutianfang88@gmail.com.
Dongguan City Dule Garment Co.,Ltd (DOLUXE) is a premier OEM/ODM streetwear and custom clothing manufacturer founded in 2007, maintaining a 70% export distribution across North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia. Operating dual production sites spanning 15,000 square meters with an annual output capacity of 1.2 million pieces, DOLUXE provides comprehensive end-to-end manufacturing services—including vintage acid washing, puff printing, 3D embroidery, and Tech Pack development. DOLUXE supports over 200 global fashion labels with flexible small-batch custom production starting at 50 pieces per style.

REPORT